Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com

Until we change who holds power, we will never have true justice in South Carolina courts.
Right now, justice isn’t determined by what’s right — it’s determined by who’s in power.
Those with power decide what is “right,” and the people suffer under a system that protects the powerful instead of the innocent.
Until we elect leaders with the courage to call out corruption and hold the powerful accountable, the system will never change.
Carlton Walker is the only candidate in this race who has proven he has that courage — to stand up, speak out, and fight for justice no matter who stands in the way.
If we keep doing what we’ve been doing, we’ll keep getting what we’ve got:
a broken, biased, and corrupt justice system.
🗳️ Vote Carlton Walker — the voice for real reform and accountability in Columbia.
Together, we can rebuild a justice system that serves the people, not the powerful.
Watch Carlton as he passionately delivers solutions to judicial reform issues for 20 minutes. Carlton's testimony helped persuade the Senate to hold off on voting for judges until judicial reform is realized in both the House and the Senate. VOTERS must support Carlton in his ongoing fight for reform in our system. Even our governor acknowledges that more needs to be done. Carlton demonstrated a commitment to upholding a fair justice system by taking the oath to defend the constitution.
Carlton is actively advocating for the implementation of more rigorous standards for Guardians in Family Court. He believes that by elevating these standards, we can ensure that guardians have the necessary qualifications, training, and experience to effectively represent the best interests of children and families involved in these sensitive cases. This initiative aims to enhance the overall quality of guardianship services, promote accountability, and foster a more supportive environment.
🔥 MAJOR JUDICIAL REFORM ALERT – WHO ACTUALLY SHOWED UP? 🔥 Today’s Judicial Reform & Criminal Justice Reform Press Conference in Columbia revealed exactly who is serious about fixing South Carolina’s broken court system — and who isn’t. 👀 Out of 5 invited candidates for Governor: ➡️ ONLY Ralph Norman & Alan Wilson showed up. ⚖️ Out of the candidates for Attorney General: ➡️ ONLY David Pascoe & David Stumbo attended. 🏛️ And for SC House District 115: ➡️ I was the ONLY candidate present. This is not Republican or Democrat — it’s about protecting South Carolina families and demanding accountability in our courts. 🛑 I’ve been advocating for Judicial Reform since 2021. 🛑 I show up when others don’t. 🛑 I am the most qualified candidate for District 115. 💪 Victory Through Persistence. 🚨 CALL TO ACTION If you believe Judicial Reform matters… If you want a representative who actually shows up… If you want a fighter for our 5 islands… 👉 Support my campaign today and donate at: 🔗 VoteCarltonWalker.com/donate-now-1 Together, we WILL fix this system.
Our mission is clear: end nepotism in the courts and cronyism in how judges are chosen. The best way to stop nepotism in family court is through jury trials, and we must reform the judicial merit selection process to eliminate cronyism. These issues were true in 2024 and remain just as urgent today. Carlton is running again to fight for fairness — Vote Carlton Walker in June and November 2026!
11/19/2025 Outside the State House, my family stood together — my mom, my dad, and me — because this fight for Judicial Reform and fairness in South Carolina is personal. We’ve lived through the failures of this system, and we’re standing here not as politicians, but as a family determined to make sure no one else goes through what we did. This video is a reminder of why I’m running: to fix our courts, protect our families, and bring honesty and accountability back to Columbia. Victory Through Persistence — for every family in the 5 Islands.
In South Carolina, the people have lost control over their own judiciary. Lawyer-legislators handpick the very judges they argue cases in front of — a system that invites favoritism, back-room deals, and zero accountability. After watching this system hurt families across our state, I’ve come to a clear conclusion: the Governor should appoint judges, and the JMSC must be rebuilt with two commissioners from every US Congressional, not just a handful of insiders in Columbia. Our rules for selecting judges should follow the same standards required inside a courtroom: fairness, transparency, due process, and the separation of powers. Until we break the lawyer-legislator monopoly, South Carolina will never have a judiciary that serves the people instead of the politicians.

The philosopher Thrasymachus once declared that those in power define what justice is. Look around — does our justice system today truly reflect fairness, accountability, and equity for everyday South Carolinians?
Carlton Walker doesn’t think so. That’s why he’s running: to shift power away from the self-serving political class and return it to the people. To stand up for the working class, for families, and for the values that built this great state.
If we’re serious about fixing our broken judicial system, we can’t keep electing the same kind of politicians. We deserve better — a system that serves everyone, not just the connected and powerful.
This is our moment. Our chance to demand real justice, real accountability, and a government that finally works for all of us.
Let’s make it happen — together.
Check out this great video
In Georgia, a jury can decide some issues related to divorce, including division of property, child support, alimony, and attorney’s fees. Georgia’s rare, we’re one of only two states that allows you to have a Jury to decide your future. This follows the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution any amount over $20. This should happen in Family and Probate Court in South Carolina. Carlton will be the Rep to make it happen.

Carlton is running for office in District 15 to improve and protect the lives of ALL children, the elderly and families in South Carolina.
Our objective is to end nepotism in courts and cronyism in the selection of judges. Jury trials are the only means to prevent nepotism from influencing Family Court decisions. Additionally, we must halt cronyism in the judicial merit selection process when choosing judges.
Currently, Family and Probate Courts in South Carolina DO NOT ALLOW for Jury Trials, which violates the 6th and 7th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Before Family Courts were formed in 1976 in South Carolina there were County Court Judges and back then you could ask for a Jury Trial for Family Matter Cases. 200 years before South Carolina Family Court was formed the Constitution was written.
It is past time, and our representatives must ensure that the 6th and 7th Amendments of our U.S. Constitution are enforced in our SC Family Courts by introducing jury trials. The reason is that if a Judge Violated your Constitutional Rights in a Family Court you have to have the money to Appeal it to the Appeals Courts. Then if they deny it, you have to pay to appeal it to the Supreme Court of South Carolina. This will cost the average person $40,000. No average person has this kind of money, so we must act now to stop this violation of the U.S. Constitution for the average Children and Families in South Carolina. Many individuals feel powerless against the current legal system. To rectify this, we must implement a fairer approach, where a jury made up of one's peers can decide Family Court cases. This will help to eradicate nepotism, as juries are unbiased and uninterested in the relationships and connections that exist between lawyers within the system. Additionally, introducing juries would offer new lawyers an opportunity to make a reputation for themselves, instead of being forced to conform to the system or risk being blacklisted.
The military is committed to defending the Constitution with their lives and our judges must also uphold it 100%. Carlton, a fourth-generation veteran, believes that if the military sacrifices their lives for the Constitution, then our judges should be held to the same high standard of perfection to uphold it.
It is imperative that the DiMarco VS. DiMarco 2011 case is codified into law. This case demonstrates that South Carolina's Family Courts are NOT adhering to the U.S. Constitution. This violation should concern ALL residents of South Carolina and motivate them to advocate for changes in the law. This effort focuses on ensuring justice for our children's future, and Carlton is committed to leading the charge.
Evidence of this Constitutional violation can easily be found by searching for DiMarco VS. DiMarco 2011 on Google. As veterans, we do not serve our country only to return home and have our constitutional rights disregarded. With your support, Carlton will tirelessly work towards changing this in South Carolina.
HOLD OUR JUDGES ACCOUNTABLE FOR NOT UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW. OUR REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS SHOULD REMOVE THEM WHEN THE JUDGE DID NOT UPHOLD THE LAW OR VIOLATED THE LAW AND COME UP FOR RE-APPOINTMENT AND RE-ELECTION IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE.
It's important to reform the Judicial Merit Selection Commission (JMSC) process by making it more open. Additionally, if you're a practicing lawyer in the House or Senate, you should not be allowed to serve on the JMSC. This is because it would create a conflict of interest when selecting judges whom you may later appear before in court. Currently, many of our South Carolina judges are elected by state lawmakers, the majority of whom are attorneys. This process is problematic as it's akin to the "fox guarding the henhouse".
It is crucial for judges to possess the utmost level of skill and precision, comparable to that of Navy Seals. Mistakes are not tolerated in this line of work, as they can lead to fatal consequences. If a judge's actions result in the destruction of even one person's life, they should no longer hold the position of judge in South Carolina. It is imperative that judges uphold this level of perfection. If they cannot, they should revert to practicing law instead of serving as a judge in South Carolina.
In Carlton's opinion, judges should be appointed for a 4-year term instead of 6 years. A 6-year term is too long, especially if a judge violates the rule of law. It is hard to remove them until they come up for reappointment and election by the House and Senate. It is necessary to review their performance every 4 years to ensure they are still fit for the job.
Additionally, the ODC (Office of Disciplinary Counsel) should include non-lawyers on the panel responsible for reviewing disciplinary actions against lawyers and judges. At present, only lawyers are involved in disciplining their fellow lawyers and judges. This is similar to a criminal having the opportunity to select their criminal associates as jurors for their trial. It is unfair and biased.
Carlton needs a grassroots effort from veterans, military personnel, and District 15 residents, as well as support from inside and outside the state, to achieve this necessary reform in South Carolina.
Carlton lives by the U.S. Navy saying...
Don't tell me how Rocky the Sea is.
Just bring the Damn Ship in.
Carlton wants to Bring the Ship in for District 15 and the Citizens for the entire state of
South Carolina.

Influential critical thinkers like Carlton identify problems. Currently, Carlton is pushing Bills Like 3481 Shared Parenting. Below is a list of changes Carlton proposes to give power back to the people and stop cronyism and favoritism.
If you're not in Carlton's District 15, don't worry, he will still try to help you to the best of his abilities once he's elected. If you support the changes listed on this page, please don't hesitate to contact your SC State Senator and SC Representative. Encourage them to see this page and support the cause for Fair Family Courts! You and your neighbors' constitutional rights are violated daily in South Carolina's Family and Probate Courts. This also needs to change NATIONALLY TOO! THIS IS NOT JUST AN SC PROBLEM.
However, a jury would have found him not guilty. After suing the prosecutor and police, he was awarded 3 million dollars, but the biased judge walked away free. The 20 years he lost cannot be replaced by the $3 million. A Jury in Juvenile Court "Family Court" would have kept him from losing 20 years of his life. Watch this story of injustice below.
DALLAS FAMILY-LAW ATTORNEYS HELPING PEOPLE NAVIGATE CUSTODY ISSUES
Co-parents do not always agree as to what constitutes an appropriate division of their rights and obligations. As such, in many instances, they will take legal action to define custody rights. While judges decide custody issues in many cases, Texas affords people the right to jury trials in custody cases. There are benefits and risks to trying a custody case before a jury, and people considering seeking a jury trial in a custody matter should speak to an attorney to fully comprehend the potential effects of taking such a course of action. The assertive Dallas child custody attorneys of McClure Law Group have extensive experience trying custody cases before judges and juries, and if you are involved in a custody dispute, we can help you determine the best manner to proceed.
THE RIGHT TO JURY TRIALS IN CUSTODY CASES
Texas differs from other states in that it allows parties to demand jury trials in custody cases. Pursuant to the Texas Family Code (the “Code”), any party involved in a custody case can request a jury trial. Juries can only decide certain matters in custody cases, however. Specifically, juries can issue verdicts appointing sole or joint managing conservators and possessory conservators. If they appoint joint managing conservators, they can determine which conservator has the sole right to designate the child’s primary residence. They can also decide whether to impose a geographic limitation on the area in which the residence must be located and, if so, can determine the area. Notably, a jury verdict in a custody case does not need to be unanimous to be valid; instead, only 10 out of a 12-member jury panel or five out of a six-member jury panel must agree.
Juries in custody cases cannot determine child-support issues, the exact terms or conditions of a party’s right to access or possession of a child, or any other right or duty of a conservator, outside of the right to designate a child’s primary residence. The Code also prohibits parties from seeking jury trials in paternity and adoption suits.

In the DeMarco vs DeMarco case, the father had the financial resources to appeal an unjust ruling made by a Family Court Judge, which cost him approximately $40,000. It is important to note that if you are held in civil contempt, you could be sent to jail. However, in Family and Probate Courts, you do not have the right to request a Jury to decide your fate. Many argue that this could be time-cons

Ensuring fair and just decisions in courts is crucial, and the best way to eliminate nepotism and favoritism is by having jury trials. This is shared by many who have experienced unjust decisions. Carlton's campaign is aimed at restoring power back to the people, and this includes promoting fair justice for all. Our founding fathers envisioned a more perfect union, and it's our responsibility to e

If the amount in controversy for fees in Family Court exceeds $20, each citizen has the right to a jury trial to determine the civil judgment they will have to pay.
Cornell Law School - COMMON LAW is defined as law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes. Though most common law is found at the state level, there is a limited body of federal common law, that is, rules create



We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.